“Confounding Expectations”: The Wisdoms of 2015 Bob Dylan

584459_933113-2015-MusiCares-Perso

Bob Dylan is the first non-athlete whom I remember admiring. From a young age, I was hypnotized by his lyrics, perplexed by his voice, and blown away by his profound influence of seemingly all rock and folk musicians coming after him. My middle school self viewed him in a paradoxical light as both a mythic figure and a common-man-turned-artist, offering a blue print for us white & weird, middle class midwestern kids seeking to combine our creativity, humor, & intellectual interests in a respectable way. He was (and is) the revolutionary at the intersection of music, poetry, and politics and I wanted desperately to find my way to that crossroads.

Though I’ve since discovered that Dylan was much closer to a singular legend than imitable folksinger/activist and I am much closer to a dabbler than an artist, I continue to be enthralled with all things the Bard. Over the weekend, Bob was honored by the charity organization MusiCares and, after a slew of artists paid tribute through song & verse, delivered a rare speech. I read the transcript this afternoon and was deeply moved by several nuggets of wisdom from Dylan, who is now 73 years old. I’ve picked some particularly enlightening sections to present & reflect upon here. A trifecta of my favorite “sleeper” tunes of his are posted at the way bottom.

“They didn’t get here by themselves.”

Throughout his part-prosaic, part-poetic speech, Dylan presented himself as a sort of folk music inevitability and puts the focus on his songs rather than himself, substituting “the songs” for “I” when speaking of his career. It’s certainly strange to think of arguably the best singer/songwriter of all time as historically inevitable, but that’s the way he views himself. Dylan shared how he spent his early years learning and playing all the standards and essentially updated those tunes as anyone who had listened to them would have.

I loved Dylan’s reminder here that all music is part of a rich tradition and that songs are often simply new iterations of what we’ve been singing for generations, all along, together. “All the songs are connected” and they “didn’t come out of thin air”, he says. He under-rates his powerful poetic voice, melodic prowess, and careful listening skills with great humility and glosses over how his creative perspective perfectly fit into the socio-political circumstances of the 1960s and 70s, but his message is true nonetheless: Even prophets have teachers and are members of communities, past and present.

“If you have to have somebody’s blessing – you figure it out.”

Dylan also spent a good portion of his address re-hashing the names of critics & colleagues who either believed in his songs (Sam Phillips, Joan Baez, John Hammond, Doc Pomus, Buck Owens) or didn’t (Merle Haggard, Ahmet Ertegun). He explains how he felt singled out by critics and was derided for “confounding expectations”. There’s a tendency for people to trap themselves within a set of expectations, of what should & should not be, and then they call out anyone or anything that challenges the schema as if they are somehow culpable. Oh, the discomfort! Where to place the blame, where to find the scapegoat?

The lesson here is two-fold: keep an unwavering faith in yourself and your work and be open to the fresh & the different. If you sit & wait around for “somebody’s blessing”, truth & beauty will pass you by.  Sure, it’s reassuring and motivating to have people in your corner, but you may never find happiness if you’re constantly searching for the approval of others. Similarly, if the feedback you receive on your art or work is that it’s too unusual and is “not the way things are done around here”, you should not be discouraged on this grounds alone. In fact, should be encouraged. This echoes the Silcon Valley “disruption” ethos, which I selectively subscribe to; just don’t forget Dylan’s words about connection & tradition above!

“Voices ought not to be measured by how pretty they are. Instead, they matter only if they convince you that they are telling the truth.”

Dylan briefly chronicled the critiques of his voice in Friday’s speech and responded with Sam Cooke’s maxim above. Whenever I come across someone who dislikes Dylan, conversation falls on his “nasal-y”, “flat”, or “talk-singing” voice . It’s not for everyone, I admit. There are a few musical acts whom I have given a limited chance because of the lead singer’s voice. But I could never understand my friends and family fixation on the tone of Dylan’s voice and inability to listen to his lyrics, by far the most skillfully crafted, true, and witty in the history of recorded American music.

In some ways, Dylan’s defense of his voice are a continuation of his response to critics who blamed him for confounding expectations. For music lovers, the Bard’s career has been fun & rewarding to follow in large part because of his ability to hop genres, switch instrumentation, and change styles all while maintaining a certain voice (artistically, not literally, speaking) and singing thousands of verses concerning a few central truths. There are many eras of Dylan, some much better than others, but they all have their own curiosities & profundities and signal his willingness to try new things & push the envelope. Above all, Dylan’s example shows us we should speak, preach, & teach your truth with care, persuasion, and a touch of good humor…”until the day there is no more days.

“Drifter’s Escape” from John Wesley Harding (1967)

“Yea! Heavy and a Bottle of Bread” from The Basement Tapes (Recorded 1967; Released 1975)

“Highlands” from Time Out of Mind (1997)

“Honest with Me” from Love and Theft (2001)

That’s all for now. As Bob said on Friday, “I’m going to put an egg in my shoe and beat it.”

Go Pack Go!: #12 vs. the 12th Man

aaron-rodgers-12_27 vs.77795c7df483a258e61ae308c4f32bcc

The NFC Championship game is upon us! Anyone who knows me knows that I am a huge Packers fan and anyone who knows me well knows that I am an analytical cat. My rational tendencies can be my worst enemy at times, but laying out all of the possibilities of a situation, in sports or otherwise, brings me comfort and allows me to think more creatively about said situation.

Compared to last week when I was a nervous wreck for 6+ days, I have been feeling strangely fine this whole week leading up to the game today.

I think this is because the Packers have now reached my expectations as a team this year and if they win today, they will have exceeded them (a packers.com reader voiced these same thoughts perfectly in an Ask Vic column this week).

I thought at the beginning of this season that we would have to go through Seattle in the playoffs to reach the Super Bowl. I also thought that it would ultimately come down to an Aaron Rodgers-led offense having to overcome a ferocious Seattle defense and CenturyLink Field’s 12th Man. I didn’t feel good about the Packers chances of advancing to the Super Bowl under those circumstances in September and, up until yesterday, I felt abject about beating the Seahawks on the road with a peg-legged Rodgers.

But things have changed in the last 48 hours. I stopped caring about the national pundits’ opinions and started listening to my heart (and countless Packers podcasts). After carefully weighing every angle of the match up, I think we have a puncher’s chance.

We could be a few hours away from a Super Bowl, so let’s have fun with it! Here are the themes on my mind going into this afternoon’s game, brought to you by the Talking Heads.

Some Good Points…

    • The Packers offensive line has improved drastically since we played the Seachickens, I mean Seahawks, in week one. Remember how it was Linsley’s first NFL game (in the loudest NFL stadium) and Sherrod played in place of Bulaga? Our O-line is now one of the strongest units in the league and I feel good about their ability to protect #12 in the pocket.
    • The Seahawks defense has faced a laundry list of low caliber quarterbacks the last several months. If you’re a Packers fan, you’ve seen the list by now. Their defense played well against Cam Newton last week, but he has practically no offensive weapons to aid him. Long story short, the Seattle defense is a force to be reckoned with but has not been tested regularly since October.
    • No Percy Harvin this time around. The mercurial WR had a handful of big plays and a combined 100 yards rushing and receiving in week one. He was traded in October and was not replaced with a weapon approaching his potency. Lynch is now the only stand out talent for Wilson to utilize.
    • Julius Peppers vs. Justin Britt. I like this match-up for Green Bay. Peppers could be in for some birthday sacks. Hey Britt: don’t take another step, don’t blame it on yourself! (Couldn’t resist the Phish reference;)
    • The Law of Averages suggests that a). the Packers are due for a game changing interception and b). one of the home teams/favorites this weekend will lose.

…Some Bad Points

  • The status of Rodgers and his golden thigh is concerning to say the least. He’s only had a week to recover from the Cowboys game. He looked fantastic in the second half last Sunday, but the Packers can’t afford a slow start or sub-par half against Seattle. The Seahawks are 4th in pass defense when the QB stays in the pocket versus 12th when the QB leaves the pocket. Rodgers will definitely be staying the pocket today. Uh oh.
  • The coaching match up favors Seattle greatly. My friends and family know that, historically, I have lacked confidence in Mike McCarthy. He’s made strides in the right direction in terms of offensive play calling, but I’ll take Pete Carroll over Mike McCarthy any day when it comes to in-game strategy. Did I mention, as a Notre Dame fan and person with ethical principles, I despise Slippery Pete? I just vomited in my mouth a little.
  • Green Bay’s recent defensive history versus athletic, out-of-the-pocket QB threats is bleak. Capers just can’t seem to figure out how the scheme against these offenses. While our defense has been much improved this year compared to years past, I will remain skeptical of this progress until we stop a Russell Wilson or Cam Newton-type in a big game.
  • Marshawn Lynch is a beast. The Packers’ run defense showed improvement since Clay Matthews was moved to the inside, but I’m still unconvinced we’ll be able to stop Marshawn for 4 quarters.

But it all works out, I’m just a little freaked out.

The Packers will win if:

  • Eddie Lacy out rushes Marshawn Lynch and
  • They score a defensive or special teams touchdown and
  • They do not allow a defensive or special teams touchdown and
  • They hold Russell Wilson to fewer than 45 yards rushing and
  • Aaron Rodgers puts together a signature performance

The Seachickens will win if:

  • Aaron Rodgers sits out more than one offensive series or
  • The Packers have more than one turnover or
  • Marshawn Lynch runs for more than 120 yards or
  • Seattle scores one or more defensive or special teams touchdown

Prediction: Packers 27, Seahawks 23

Think of Glendale….Super Bowl City!

1105000062-l